To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibial metaphyseal fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2014

Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibial metaphyseal fracture

Vol: 3| Issue: 6| Number:86| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:3

Intramedullary nailing versus plating for extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):667-76. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.024.

Contributing Authors:
XH Xue SG Yan XZ Cai MM Shi T Lin

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

14 studies (5 prospective and 9 retrospective) were included in this meta-analysis (842 patients) comparing the clinical outcomes and complication rates between intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plating. Results from meta-analysis revealed significant between-group differences in infection rate favouring IMN, and malunion rate favouring plating. Rates of nonunion, secondary surgery, implant removal...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue