To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Compliance to oral bisphosphonate therapy similar regardless of follow-up type

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2014

Compliance to oral bisphosphonate therapy similar regardless of follow-up type

Vol: 3| Issue: 5| Number:53| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management

Osteoporos Int. 2014 Apr;25(4):1345-55. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2610-4. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

Contributing Authors:
K Ganda A Schaffer S Pearson MJ Seibel

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

102 patients with incident osteoporotic fractures were initiated on oral bisphosphonate therapy within a secondary fracture prevention program with subsequent management by either a specialist (Group A) or a primary care physician (Group B). Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy was determined over 2 years. Compliance and persistence were high, and did not significantly differ ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue