To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cognitive-behavioural therapy provides significant benefits following lumbar fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2015

Cognitive-behavioural therapy provides significant benefits following lumbar fusion

Vol: 4| Issue: 4| Number:71| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial

Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2889-z. Epub 2013 Jul 9

Contributing Authors:
M Monticone S Ferrante M Teli B Rocca C Foti A Lovi M Brayda Bruno

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

130 patients who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar spondylothesis or lumbar spinal stenosis were randomized to a postoperative rehabilitation program of either combined exercise and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), or exercise alone. The purpose of this study was to investigate if a 4 week program of CBT offered benefits to patients in terms of disability, pain, kinesiophobia, catastrophising...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue