To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Percutaneous compression plate vs proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2014

Percutaneous compression plate vs proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture

Vol: 3| Issue: 2| Number:48| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized study

J Orthop Sci. 2013 Nov;18(6):977-86

Contributing Authors:
Q Guo Y Shen Z Zong Y Zhao H Liu X Hua H Chen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

90 elderly patients (>60 years of age) with intertrochanteric hip fractures underwent surgical implantation of a percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) or a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device. The purpose was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes resulting from the differing treatment approaches. The PCCP resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter operation times compared...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue