To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

CTS: Comparison of short and standard incision in open release versus endoscopic release

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2015

CTS: Comparison of short and standard incision in open release versus endoscopic release

Vol: 4| Issue: 3| Number:22| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparison of three surgical methods

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Jul;38(6):646-50

Contributing Authors:
T Weis MB Larsen AI Sorensen KL Crone ME Boeckstyns

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

A total of 90 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were randomized to undergo surgical treatment using either open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) with a classic incision, OCTR with a short incision approach, or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of each treatment in terms of post-operative pain, and the disappearance of paraesthesia, ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue