To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar outcome using a full tibial tunnel or an all-inside tibial socket following ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2013

Similar outcome using a full tibial tunnel or an all-inside tibial socket following ACLR

Vol: 2| Issue: 9| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel

Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.009

Contributing Authors:
JH Lubowitz R Schwartzberg P Smith

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and fifty patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury were randomized to a procedure with either a full tibial bone tunnel or an all-inside tibial socket. The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical and functional outcome of these techniques, along with their effect on tunnel widening. The results indicated primarily no significant...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue