To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cervico-thoracic vs. cervical thrust manipulation for mechanical neck pain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
September 2013

Cervico-thoracic vs. cervical thrust manipulation for mechanical neck pain

Vol: 2| Issue: 8| Number:6| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Short-term effects of spinal thrust joint manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial

Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jun;27(6):504-12. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464501. Epub 2012 Nov 5

Contributing Authors:
M Saavedra-Hernandez M Arroyo-Morales I Cantarero-Villanueva C Fernandez-Lao AM Castro-Sanchez EJ Puentedura C Fernandez-de-Las-Penas

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

82 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were randomized to receive full manipulation, which included mid-cervical, cervico-thoracic and thoracic thrust manipulations, or to a group receiving cervical thrust manipulation alone. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was an added benefit of the full manipulation treatment to neck pain, disability and range of motion. After one wee...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue