To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar infection rates with the use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded cement in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2013

Similar infection rates with the use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded cement in TKA

Vol: 2| Issue: 6| Number:98| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded cement in total knee arthroplasty does not reduce the incidence of infection: a prospective randomized study in 3000 knees

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 1;95(9):769-74. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00901

Contributing Authors:
P Hinarejos P Guirro J Leal F Montserrat X Pelfort ML Sorli JP Horcajada L Puig

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

3000 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (2948 of whom completed the study) were randomized to the use of either antibiotic-loaded or non-antibiotic-loaded cement in the fixation of their prosthesis. The primary goal of this study was to compare infection rates between the two groups and the secondary goal was to determine if risk factors existed for deep infection. Results indicated...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue