To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Piriformis Fossa Versus Greater Trochanteric Entry Portals in Femoral Intramedullary Nail

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Piriformis Fossa Versus Greater Trochanteric Entry Portals in Femoral Intramedullary Nail

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:98| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Functional Outcome Following Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Piriformis Fossa and Greater Trochanteric Entry Portals

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery; 2011; 93; 1385-1391

Contributing Authors:
James P Stannard Larry Bankston Lydia A Futch Gerald McGwin David A Volgas

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

110 patients with femoral shaft fractures were randomized to receive intramedullary nailing of the femur with the use of a trochanteric portal or a piriformis fossa entry portal. The results of the 12-month study indicated that the two studied interventions did not differ in terms of hip function, muscle strength, and analog pain scale values. It was also found that at 6-month follow-up the trocha...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue