To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing knee kinematics of cruciate-substituting and cruciate-retaining implants for TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2013

Comparing knee kinematics of cruciate-substituting and cruciate-retaining implants for TKA

Vol: 2| Issue: 4| Number:86| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant

Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1798-4. Epub 2013 Jan 30

Contributing Authors:
C Baier HR Springorum J Gotz J Schaumburger C Luring J Grifka J Beckmann

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients were randomized to examine whether cruciate-substituting (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) led to different knee kinematics. Patients received either one of the two procedures and were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months using computer navigation. The results indicated that there were no significant differences in navigation-based knee kinematics betwee...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue