To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Oral dabigatran as effective as enoxaparin in preventing thromboprophylaxis after THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2014

Oral dabigatran as effective as enoxaparin in preventing thromboprophylaxis after THA

Vol: 3| Issue: 3| Number:28| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II*). A randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Thromb Haemost. 2011 Apr;105(4):721-9. doi: 10.1160/TH10-10-0679. Epub 2011 Jan 12

Contributing Authors:
BI Eriksson OE Dahl MH Huo AA Kurth S Hantel K Hermansson JM Schnee RJ Friedman RE-NOVATE II Study Group

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

2055 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to receive oral dabigatran or subcutaneous enoxaparin to compare the impact each pharmaceutical had on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality. Following assessments over a 3 month period, the results displayed that both dabigatran and enoxaparin were equally effective in preventing VTE following TH...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue