To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

THR: Postoperative analgesia with oxycodone or IVPCA morphine results in similar outcomes

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2014

THR: Postoperative analgesia with oxycodone or IVPCA morphine results in similar outcomes

Vol: 3| Issue: 3| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Oral oxycodone offers equivalent analgesia to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after total hip replacement: a randomized, single-centre, non-blinded, non-inferiority study

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):865-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer084. Epub 2011 Apr 13

Contributing Authors:
MP Rothwell D Pearson JD Hunter PA Mitchell T Graham-Woollard L Goodwin G Dunn

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

114 patients undergoing primary elective total hip replacement (THR) under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to determine the comparative efficacy of oral oxycodone with i.v patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) as a method of postoperative analgesia. Patients received either Oxycontin 20mg or IVPCA with morphine, and were monitored for pain and nausea in the first 72 hours postoperatively. The re...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue