To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Use of Canadian C-Spine Rule decreases unnecessary imaging, without missing injury

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Use of Canadian C-Spine Rule decreases unnecessary imaging, without missing injury

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: Prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial

BMJ. 2009 Oct 29;339:b4146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4146.

Contributing Authors:
IG Stiell CM Clement J Grimshaw RJ Brison BH Rowe MJ Schull JS Lee J Brehaut RD McKnight MA Eisenhauer J Dreyer E Letovsky T Rutledge I MacPhail S Ross A Shah JJ Perry BR Holroyd U Ip H Lesiuk GA Wells

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

11,824 stable and alert patients presenting with blunt trauma to the head or neck took part in this matched pair cluster randomized trial. 12 hospitals were randomized to either implement the Canadian C-spine rule or to not implement this rule. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Canadian C-spine rule use in Canadian hospitals. The Canadian C-spine rule was able to successfully identify all c...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue