To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

TKR: No difference between all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial implants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

TKR: No difference between all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial implants

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:541| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Should we reconsider all-polyethylene tibial implants in total knee replacement?

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Dec;88(12):1596-602

Contributing Authors:
SD Muller DJ Deehan JP Holland SE Outterside LM Kirk PJ Gregg AW McCaskie

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

51 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were randomized to receive total knee replacement (TKR) with either all-polyethylene or metal-backed tibial implants. Over 2 years, radiostereophotogrammetric analysis indicated that there was no difference between the two groups in the migration of prostheses. The two groups also did not differ in their SF-12, Oxford knee scores, alignment o...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue