To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Non resorbable PEEK implants superior to resorbable PLDLLA implants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Non resorbable PEEK implants superior to resorbable PLDLLA implants

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:368| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up

Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):618-22.

Contributing Authors:
TU Jiya T Smit BJ van Royen M Mullender

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

26 patients with chronic back pain and irradiating lower extremity symptoms underwent instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion using either a nonresorbable Telamon PEEK cage or a resorbable Telamon PLDDLA cage, to aid in fusion. Results of this randomized study indicate that almost all clinical outcomes improved for the PEEK group at 2-year evaluation when compared to preoperative scores; ho...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue