To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intramedullary nailing provides better recovery of mobility for trochanteric hip fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Intramedullary nailing provides better recovery of mobility for trochanteric hip fractures

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:401| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: A randomised trial of 600 fractures

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):391-7.

Contributing Authors:
MJ Parker TR Bowers GA Pryor

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Dr. Martyn Parker elaborates on intramedullary nailing and sliding hip screws

Synopsis

598 patients (600 fractures) with trochanteric fractures of the hip were randomized to management using a sliding hip screw (SHS) or intramedullary nailing to compare clinical outcomes. At 1 year follow-up clinical results were comparable between the two groups. The most notable difference was a significantly better improvement in mobility in the intramedullary nailing group.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue