To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Adding Clavipectorial Fascial Plane Block vs. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Clavicle Surgery

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2024

Adding Clavipectorial Fascial Plane Block vs. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Clavicle Surgery

Vol: 306| Issue: 1| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block or interscalene brachial plexus block in clavicle surgery: a single-centre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):985-992.

Contributing Authors:
G Xu P Su B Cai Y Liu D Jiang Y He M Zhou M Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients undergoing elective internal fixation for unilateral clavicle fractures were randomly allotted to be administered with superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) combined with either clavipectoral fascial plane block (CPB; n=25) or interscalene brachial plexus block (IBP; n=25). The primary outcome of interest was duration of analgesia measured by the time of first use of analgesics. The...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue