To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Tibiofibular Proximal Osteotomy w/ Absorbable Spacer vs Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee OA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2023

Tibiofibular Proximal Osteotomy w/ Absorbable Spacer vs Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee OA

Vol: 303| Issue: 9| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Proximal tibia osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7): 1715-1727.

Contributing Authors:
W Chen R Zhang S Jia Y Cui K Zhao T Wang H Lv Y Zhu H Tian B Wang J Li SR Lyu J Wang Y Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

160 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive an open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) (n=78) or a tibiofibular proximal osteotomy combined with an absorbable spacer (TPOASI) (n=82). The primary outcome of interest was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes of interest included knee pain, radiographic parameters, Knee So...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue