To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Rehabilitation plus usual care reduces rate of re-injury vs. usual care alone post-ankle sprain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2019

Rehabilitation plus usual care reduces rate of re-injury vs. usual care alone post-ankle sprain

Vol: 8| Issue: 8| Number:22| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Rehabilitation Exercises Reduce Reinjury Post Ankle Sprain, But the Content and Parameters of an Optimal Exercise Program Have Yet to Be Established: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul;100(7):1367-1375.

Contributing Authors:
CM Bleakley JB Taylor SL Dischiavi C Doherty E Delahunt

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

7 studies were included in this meta-analysis comparing exercise-based rehabilitation plus usual care to usual care alone for the prevention of re-injury following acute ankle sprain. EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE were searched from inception to January 2017. Results revealed no significant difference in the incidence of re-injury between the exercise-based rehabilitation plus usual ca...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue