To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar mid- to long-term radiographic and clinical outcome of pegged and keeled shoulder implants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2018

Similar mid- to long-term radiographic and clinical outcome of pegged and keeled shoulder implants

Vol: 7| Issue: 3| Number:6| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2078-2085

Contributing Authors:
DP O'Connor GM Gartsman TB Edwards HA Elkousy CM Press CM Kilian KM Smith BJ Morris

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients scheduled for total shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to receive either an all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component or an all-polyethylene keeled glenoid component. Patients were assessed for radiographic lucency rate, failure rate, clinical scores, and shoulder range of motion over a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Results demonstrated no significant difference between the pegged an...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue